Gurbaksh singh v state of punjab
WebAug 21, 2024 · Keeping in view the factum of compromise effected between the parties and the law laid down by this Court in the case of Kulwinder Singh and others vs. State of … WebThe mouth of the plastic bag in possession of Gurbaksh Singh was open and poppy husk was visible in the same. Then, ASI Nirbhai Singh, had weighed the plastic bag, which …
Gurbaksh singh v state of punjab
Did you know?
WebGurbaksh Singh Sibbia (supra), a Constitution Bench of this Court has observed and held that the facility which Section 438, Cr. P.C. affords is generally referred to as … WebRT @KaustubhMehta97: 3. Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v. State of Punjab (1980) - This judgment held that anticipatory bail can be granted in cases where there is no prima …
WebOct 28, 1991 · The Supreme Court (Gurbaksh Singh v. State of Punjab, AIR 1980 SC1632 at page 1646) rightly...Jaspal Singh, J.— What should the court do when, to borrow the expression of Krishna Iyer J, in Moti Ram v. State of M.P.... (Moti Ram v. State of M.P AIR 1978 SC 1594 at page 1596) again, puts “the little man in peril of... WebDocument Description: Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v. State of Punjab [1980 SC] for CLAT 2024 is part of Current Affairs & General Knowledge preparation. The notes and questions for Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v. State of Punjab [1980 SC] have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v.
WebPETITIONER: GURBAKSH SINGH SIBBIA ETC. Vs. RESPONDENT: STATE OF PUNJAB DATE OF JUDGMENT09/04/1980 BENCH: CHANDRACHUD, Y.V. ((CJ) BENCH: …
WebGurbaksh Singh Sibbia vs State of Punjab (1980) case: SC ruled that “Sec. 438(1) should be interpreted in the light of Article 21 (protection of life and personal liberty) of the …
WebGurbaksh Singh Sibbia v. State of Punjab [1980 SC] These appeals by special leave involve a question of great public importance bearing, at once, on personal liberty and … chinese ringtones freeWebApr 5, 2016 · Basic reliance for this stand was placed on State v. Santokh Singh AIR 1956 Madh Bha 130 : 1956 Cri LJ 619 and observations in Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v. State of Punjab. 13. We regret our inability to agree with the learned Counsel for the petitioner that custody by the police is a matter wholly irrelevant to the investigation of an offence. chinese ringtoneWebSep 22, 2024 · Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v. State of Punjab (1980) 2 SCC 565 , 1980 SCC (Cri) 465...SCC OnLine Del 9703 in and by which the High Court has declined to grant anticipatory bail in CBI No. RC220-2024-E-0011 registered under Sections 120-B and 420 IPC and Sections 8, 13... State Of Assam v. Bhagya Kalita grand theft ummagine jellyneoWebGurbaksh Singh Sibbia v. State of Punjab3: It was in this case only that a Constitution bench, for the first time, laid down the scope of section 438. In the present case, Gurbaksh Singh, a minister of Irrigation and Power in the government of Punjab, was involved in the allegations of corruption 1Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure chinese rings magic trickWebApr 7, 2024 · In the case of Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar, the Supreme Court reiterated the importance of Section 41A and held that the police must follow the procedure laid down in the Code of Criminal Procedure while making arrests. The court also observed that the accused has the right to be heard before he is arrested and that the police must provide ... grand theft third degree felony floridaWebAug 21, 2024 · Keeping in view the factum of compromise effected between the parties and the law laid down by this Court in the case of Kulwinder Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and another 2007(3) RCR (Crl.) 1052 (P & H) and as approved by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab and others, (2012)10 SCC 303, this petition is … chinese rings trickWebGurbaksh Singh Sibbi Etc vs State of Punjab on April, 1980 FACTS AND ISSUES: In this case, the appellant a minister in the govt of Punjab, was facing grave. allegation of corruption against him and others. Application of anticipatory. bail was filed in the high court of Punjab & Haryana under section 438, grand theft third degree felony